COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns
Concern 1:
PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS AT DEVELOPING A VACCINE FOR CORONAVIRUSES HAVE PROVEN CHALLENGING AND LIFE-THREATENING.
Scientists first attempted to develop a coronavirus vaccine after China's 2002 SARS-CoV outbreak.(1) They vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful, as all the animals developed an antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the animals were exposed to the wild virus, many suffered a hyper-immune response and died.
Researchers saw this same "enhanced immune response" during human trials of the failed RSV vaccine in the 1960s, in which two children died.(2)
Are we already seeing this “enhanced immune response” in growing numbers of people who have received the COVID-19 vaccine, then got sick with COVID-19 and died?
“A total of 10,262 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections had been reported from 46 U.S. states and territories as of April 30, 2021... Based on preliminary data, 2,725 (27%) vaccine breakthrough infections were asymptomatic, 995 (10%) patients were known to be hospitalized, and 160 (2%) patients died.”(3)
We encourage you to watch this short video clip in which Peter Hotez and Paul Offit, two of the world's top vaccine experts, discuss the unique and frightening dangers inherent in skipping animal testing and fast-tracking a coronavirus vaccine.
https://youtu.be/xCnOqwvPivE?t=92
If the experts are concerned, shouldn’t we all be?
Sources:
(1) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536382
Concern 2:
“WARP SPEED” TESTING, DEVELOPMENT, AND ROLL-OUT
The COVID-19 vaccine was fast-tracked at “warp speed,” was allowed to skip animal testing,(1) and is now also being fast-tracked in the trials for children.
We have concerns about this timeline - maybe you do, too?
These vaccines were not tested on people with variable pre-existing health conditions to be sure it is safe, not only for healthy people, but also for people with autoimmune conditions, chronic inflammatory diseases, diabetes, cancer, and more.
These vaccines have not been required to undergo the gold standard of safety testing: long-term, randomized, double-blind, inert placebo-controlled trials.
Without long-term studies like those required of pharmaceutical drugs (4+ years), how will we know about potential health effects like autoimmune conditions, brain or behavioral disorders, diabetes, or cancers, all of which can take years to develop? We are already seeing serious adverse health effects such as blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, neurological problems, and more.
No drug or vaccine is universally safe for everyone. How will we know who is in that small - or perhaps not so small - population of people for whom the vaccine has dangerous side effects? Will remaining clinical trials be able to identify those people or children before they are injured?
These vaccines are now also being fast-tracked in the trials for children, with authorization already given for 12 years and older. Children as young as 6 months old are currently in trials.(2) The trials were very small in size as well, which is very concerning. The risk/benefit assessment for children does not warrant giving these vaccines to children.
It’s enticing to think a coronavirus vaccine is the magic bullet to save our population, restore our economy, and bring our lives “back to normal.” We, like most Americans, wish it were that simple. But without thorough, long-term, inert placebo testing in diverse populations, how can we be confident in the safety or efficacy of this vaccine?
Sources:
(1) https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/11/researchers-rush-to-start-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine-trial-without-usual-animal-testing/
(2) https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210316/moderna-launches-clinical-trials-on-young-children
Concern 3:
LACK OF FINANCIAL LIABILITY UNDER THE PREP ACT
Given the extra risks, pressures, and financial incentives to bring a COVID-19 vaccine to market quickly, did the government put forth measures to spur companies to proceed carefully and ensure safety to the public?
Unfortunately, no.
Instead, on February 4, 2020, with only 11 active COVID-19 cases in the US, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a Declaration under the PREP (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness) Act. This act gives coronavirus vaccine makers full immunity from liability, so that they cannot be sued for any damages caused.(1)
Please take a few moments to look it over:
Does it make sense that vaccine developers were financially incentivized to fast-track a vaccine but not financially liable for the final safety profile?
If the manufacturers aren’t liable, doctors aren’t liable, nurses aren’t, the CDC isn’t, the FDA isn’t, the KDHE isn’t… then who is?
What if we rush a vaccine to market that later causes cancer, like the polio vaccine of 1955?(2)
What if the vaccine winds up causing more harm than good? No vaccine should ever be required, suggested, or mandated unless it has the safety studies from independent agencies which prove it to be virtually risk-free.
Until we hold companies financially liable in all circumstances - even a pandemic emergency - they won’t be incentivized to guarantee their products are harmless. For a product that will be injected into millions, if not billions of people, shouldn’t we be certain?
Sources:
Concern 4:
THE NEW mRNA VACCINES
Do they alter DNA?
How mRNA vaccines work:
They send a chemically-synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.
According to the CDC, that’s where it stops. The CDC says mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way.” They assert that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides) and that the cell “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”
However, a December 2020 preprint about SARS-CoV-2 by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.(1)
Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells.” “These DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed”— and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.
The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Doug Corrigan, Doctor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already outlined the possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.(2)
In a second article, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.(3)
What about reverse transcription?
As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into DNA in the cell nucleus.
The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.(4)
The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ insertion sites in the human genome and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response…such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.”
In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”(5)
Could injecting DNA or mRNA into our bodies be genetically-altering? Could there be hidden, unintended consequences? How could a vaccine developed with record speed ever determine the long-term safety implications?
Sources:
(1) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
(2) https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
(3) https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
(4) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full.pdf
(5) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120651/
Concern 5:
RISK OF ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION ENHANCED BY THE VACCINE
We have heard a lot about the threat of “asymptomatic carriers” in spreading COVID-19. But did you know that some vaccines create asymptomatic carriers?
Several vaccines have been proven to merely mask symptoms rather than curb transmission of the disease. Instead, they allow the vaccinated to become silent, asymptomatic carriers.
Can you see the danger here? Instead of the infected feeling the discomfort of their illness and staying home while they recover, they remain symptom-free and continue going to work, to school, and to social gatherings - unknowingly and unintentionally putting others at risk.
This phenomenon has been observed with the whooping cough/pertussis vaccine:
In a 2014 primate study, “baboons vaccinated with [acellular pertussis] were protected from severe pertussis-associated symptoms but not from colonization, did not clear the infection faster than naive animals, and readily transmitted B. persussis to unvaccinated contacts."(1)
A 2015 mathematical modeling of pertussis cases in the US and UK concluded that, “asymptomatic transmission is the most parsimonious explanation for many of the observations surrounding the resurgence of B. pertussis in the US and UK."(2)
Despite mounting scientific and empirical evidence showing the failure of the pertussis vaccine, it continues to be licensed, sold, and administered.
What if the COVID-19 vaccine – which also targets a respiratory virus – has this same effect? Would the rushed clinical trials uncover it? If they did, how could we trust that the results wouldn’t be swept under the rug by industries and regulators with conflicts of interests, just as they have been with pertussis?
Though the pertussis vaccine failure continues to cause outbreaks in highly or fully vaccinated populations, the outbreaks are still conveniently blamed on “anti-vaxxers.” Does such undeserved ostracization and discrimination lie in the future for those who choose to refuse the COVID-19 vaccine?
With COVID-19 “breakout cases” on the rise, are we already seeing this phenomenon with COVID-19 vaccines?
Sources:
Concern 6:
VACCINATING FOR A MUTATING VIRUS
Experience with the flu virus has taught us that viruses are continually mutating.(1) Because of this ever-changing nature, scientists must reconstitute the flu virus vaccine every year to target the anticipated strain.
As would be expected, this guesswork does not have a high success rate. The most recent report from the 2018-2019 flu season shows that the vaccine was only 29% effective.(2)
Preliminary studies have already found 33 different mutations in SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.(3)
“Previously, scientists believed that [SARS-CoV-2] tends to mutate at a low rate, and suggested that we may not need to worry too much about vaccine development. The current study would make people rethink this.”(3)
Since the family of coronaviruses are very cold and flu-like, will a COVID-19 vaccine be just as difficult (or impossible) to nail down as the flu? If so, does this change how we weigh the risks and benefits of receiving the vaccine?
Sources:
(1) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/viruses/change.htm
(2) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/effectiveness-studies.htm
(3) https://www.newsweek.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-mutate-study-china-1499503
Concern 7:
THE QUANTITY OF COVID-19 VACCINE INJURY REPORTS TO VAERS
The ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) states that our vaccine surveillance system should catch any problems and make up for any shortcomings in the trials. In the United States, that post-surveillance system is called VAERS - the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The sheer number of COVID-19 vaccine injury reports currently reported to VAERS should have already thrown red flags by now.
VAERS COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Reports as of June 4, 2021:(1)
Total Reports: 329,021
Deaths: 5,888
Hospitalizations: 19,597
Life Threatening: 5,885
Urgent Care: 43,891
Office Visits: 58,800
Anaphylaxis: 1,459
Bell’s Palsy: 1,737
Heart Attacks: 2,190
Myocarditis/Pericarditis: 1,087
Miscarriages: 652
Severe Allergic Reaction: 15,052
Thrombocytopenia/Low Platelet: 1,564
Disabled: 4,583
It is clear that these COVID-19 vaccines are already killing and seriously injuring people. If these stats were true of an airbag or child car seat, do you suppose they would still be on the market?
COVID-19 VACCINE TRANSMISSION TO THE UNVACCINATED
You’ve probably started to hear stories of unvaccinated people experiencing health issues after being in close contact with someone who was recently vaccinated. Many have written this off as “conspiracy,” but recently a Pfizer trial document surfaced that actually addressed this very real possibility of “transmission” to the unvaccinated.
In section 8.3.5 of this document, it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. This is strange because pregnant women/new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?
Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy. The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Or if a male family member, who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact, then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
In other words, Pfizer is admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of a person who has been vaccinated.
Pfizer also confirms that it is possible to expose a baby to the mRNA vaccine via breastfeeding, even if the mother has not received the Pfizer jab. They state this is again possible via environmental exposure, in which the mother is found to be breastfeeding an infant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Pfizer also confirms in section 8.3.5.3 of the document that adverse reactions may occur after ‘Occupational Exposure.’ The document states occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention and says this “may or may not lead to the occurrence of an Adverse Event”.(1)
“...these experimental vaccines produce many trillions of spike proteins in their recipients, these vaccinated individuals ‘can shed some of these [spike protein] particles to close contacts,’ causing disease in them.”(2)
In light of this Pfizer document, and the thousands of stories documenting adverse adverse effects after being around the vaccinated, this presents a very real and serious concern about COVID-19 vaccines.
Sources:
(1) https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
(2) https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated
Concern 8:
THE MANDATING OF COVID-19 VACCINES BY COLLEGES, SCHOOLS, EMPLOYERS
In light of all we don’t know about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, and in spite of the fact that none of these vaccines have been fully approved by the FDA, it is very disturbing to see the number of colleges that will be requiring students to receive the COVID-19 vaccine before returning to in-person classes.(1)
Some states are passing legislation that puts restrictions on colleges mandating the COVID-19 vaccine. Recently the Governor of Arizona signed an executive order that prohibits public universities and community colleges from mandating COVID-19 tests, vaccines, and masks for students to participate in learning. Will other states follow suit?(2)
There are also legal issues around colleges and universities mandating vaccines. Experts can’t seem to agree on what the law actually says and where the U.S. Constitution fits into all of this.(3)
Another serious concern for many people is that employers are putting pressure on employees to get vaccinated or lose their job. Even though these vaccines are only under Emergency Use Authorization, some employers have made the decision to mandate them. However, as with colleges, employers may be facing some uncertain situations in the future, including lawsuits and worker’s compensation claims.
“When one reviews the FDA’s EUA and its approved labeling, a.k.a. ‘fact sheets,’ for each COVID-19 vaccine, they each clearly provide that: ‘It is [the vaccine recipient’s] choice to receive or not receive the COVID-19 Vaccine.’” The reason each fact sheet includes this language is because the same section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that authorizes the FDA to grant an EUA also requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ‘ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed…of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.’”(4)
Where there is risk, there must be choice!
Sources:
(1) https://universitybusiness.com/state-by-state-look-at-colleges-requiring-vaccines/
(2) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/arizona-governor-blocks-covid-policies-at-public-universities/ar-AAL57f6
(3) https://www.thecollegefix.com/experts-disagree-on-legality-of-university-vaccine-mandates/
(4) https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/the-eeoc-did-not-say-federal-law-permits-requiring-a-covid-19-vaccine/
Concern 9:
COVID-19 VACCINE CAUSING HEART PROBLEMS IN YOUNG ADULTS AND ADOLESCENTS
The CDC recently announced that they are investigating cases of young adults and adolescents who have experienced heart problems after receiving COVID-19 vaccines.(1) They state that most cases appear to be “mild.” DEATH is not mild!
VAERS ID: 1199455 - 17-year-old girl from Wisconsin suffers cardiac arrest and death 8 days following COVID-19 vaccination.(2)
VAERS ID: 1225942 - 16-year-old girl from Wisconsin suffers cardiac arrest at home and dies 9 days following COVID-19 vaccination.(3)
VAERS ID: 1225732 - 16-year-old boy from Virginia developed chest pain which worsened over time and led to diagnosis of myocarditis 1 day following COVID-19 vaccination.(4)
VAERS ID: 1187918 - 15-year-old boy from New Hampshire suffered cardiac arrest and died 3-4 days following COVID-19 vaccination.(5)
VAERS ID: 1310120 - 16-year-old boy from Ohio developed severe chest pain 4 days following COVID-19 vaccination.(6)
VAERS ID: 1307020 - 16-year-old boy from Connecticut suffers chest pain, shortness of breath, headache and heart racing 1 day following COVID-19 vaccination.(7)
VAERS ID: 1306598 - 16-year-old boy from Illinois presented to the ER with shortness of breath, coughing up blood, diagnosed with myopericarditis with cardiogenic shock and respiratory failure 3 days following COVID-19 vaccination.(8)
VAERS ID: 1242573 - 15-year-old boy from Colorado suffered heart failure and died 1 day following COVID-19 vaccination.(9)
The Israeli People’s Committee recently issued a Report of Adverse Events Related to the Coronavirus Vaccine in which they also found a very concerning trend of heart issues. (10)(11)(12)
Children should not be having heart attacks! Why do teenagers need this vaccine, when this age group has almost no risk of dying from COVID-19?
Sources:
(2) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1199455
(3) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1225942
(4) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1225732
(5) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1187918
(6) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1310120
(7) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1307020
(8) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1306598
(9) https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1242573
Concern 10:
CO-ADMINISTRATION OF COVID-19 VACCINES AND OTHER VACCINES
Initially the CDC recommended for adults that the COVID-19 vaccine be administered alone, with at least a 14 day interval before or after the administration of any other vaccine.
Now that children as young as 12 are authorized to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, suddenly the CDC has changed their recommendation that the COVID-19 vaccine and any other vaccine can be administered at the same time, with no regard to timing.
“Although data are not available for COVID-19 vaccines administered simultaneously with other vaccines, extensive experience with non-COVID-19 vaccines has demonstrated that immunogenicity and adverse event profiles are generally similar when vaccines are administered simultaneously as when they are administered alone. COVID-19 vaccines and other vaccines may now be administered without regard to timing. This includes simultaneous administration of COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines on the same day, as well as co-administration within 14 days….If multiple vaccines are administered at a single visit, administer each injection in a different injection site.”(1)
This is extremely concerning, as there are NO safety studies on this whatsoever. They simply do not know whether it is safe to give these vaccines at the same time. Shockingly, their suggestion is simply “to give [the vaccines] in different limbs.”
(1) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/clinical-considerations.html#Coadministration
Concern 11:
EFFECTIVENESS OF COVID-19 VACCINES
From the start, the media campaigns portrayed the COVID-19 vaccines as “safe and effective” stating, for example, that the Pfizer vaccine was 95% effective and the Moderna vaccine was 94% effective.(1)
What they failed to make clear was that in trials these vaccines were only tested to see if they prevented COVID-19 (the disease/symptoms), not SARS-Cov-2 (the infection). This fact is becoming clearer each day as we hear about more “breakthrough” cases, where fully vaccinated people are coming down with COVID and/or dying. As of June 7, 2021, according to the CDC, there have been 3,459 hospitalized or fatal breakthrough cases, with 603 of those ending in death.(2)
It is important to point out as well, that the CDC had set the PCR cycles for COVID testing so high early in the pandemic, that the tests were throwing a lot of false positives. This resulted in inflated reporting of COVID cases. After the vaccination campaign began, the CDC lowered the cycle threshold for the PCR tests, but only for those fully vaccinated.(3)
In addition to the cycle threshold change, the CDC also quietly altered how they were reporting these “breakthrough” cases. According to a statement on the CDC’s website, the agency said to help “maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance” it will stop reporting weekly COVID breakthrough infections unless they result in hospitalization or death.(2)
Both of these moves by the CDC have resulted in much lower COVID case numbers in the fully vaccinated, giving a false picture of the true efficacy of these vaccines.
Sources:
(1) https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-vaccine/art-20484859
(2) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
(3) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
Concern 12:
INFORMED CONSENT OR COERCION?
As demand for COVID vaccines among adults falls short of public health officials’ goals, more and more states and businesses are rolling out incentives to counter “vaccine hesitancy.” Here are some examples of “incentives” for getting the COVID-19 vaccine:
A lottery style giveaway of $1 million each to give people, plus another five people four-year college scholarships(1)
Free donuts(2)
Free beer(3)
Free baseball tickets(4)
$50 debit cards(5)
$100 gift cards(6)
$100 savings bonds(7)
Time off from work, extra vacation, and other employment encentives
Attorney Mary Holland has something to say about this:
“It is not explicitly illegal for governments and corporations to offer incentives for an unapproved medical procedure, such as the Emergency Use Authorization COVID vaccines. Nonetheless, incentives like the Ohio lottery violate the underlying principle of informed consent, which requires that there be no deceit or overreaching and that subjects fully understand the medical decision they are making.”(8)
If vaccines worked and saved people’s lives, they would stand on their own merit and people would not have to be coerced to get vaccinated. People deserve to be fully informed of the risks and benefits of these vaccines without being rushed or blinded by incentives.
Sources:
(1) https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/covid-vaccine-ohio-giving-away-million-dollar-prizes-scholarships.html
(2) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/one-third-of-the-us-population-is-vaccinated-100-can-get-a-free-krispy-kreme-doughnut/ar-BB1eVxfO
(3) https://6abc.com/nj-covid-free-beer-and-shot-new-jersey-governor-murphy-restrictions-brewery-vaccines/10584793/
(4) https://www.amny.com/news/cuomo-yankees-mets-free-tickets-covid-19-vaccine/
(5) https://www.metrotimes.com/news-hits/archives/2021/05/03/want-50-convince-someone-to-get-a-covid-19-vaccine-and-the-city-of-detroit-will-pay-up
(6) https://governor.maryland.gov/2021/05/03/governor-hogan-announces-financial-incentive-program-for-state-employees-to-encourage-covid-19-vaccinations/
(7) https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/world/west-virginia-vaccine-savings-bonds.html
(8) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ohio-offers-college-scholarships-entice-people-get-vaccinated/
Concern 13:
IS THE SPIKE PROTEIN CAUSING INJURY?
Due to the “warp speed” manner in which this vaccine has been pushed out to the masses, it has left many doctors and scientists scrambling to figure out what is causing all the injuries and deaths. Many are looking into the spike protein. Here are some of their findings:
The spike protein can cross the blood-brain-barrier.(1)(2)
The spike proteins of the virus AND the vaccine can potentially damage brain, heart, kidneys, liver, and skin.(3)
The spike protein in brain endothelial cells is associated with formation of microthrombi (clots). Viral proteins appear to cause tissue damage without actively replicating virus.(4)
The mRNA-induced spike protein can bind to brain tissue 10 to 20 times stronger than the spike proteins that are (naturally) part of the original virus.(5)
The spike protein alone is almost entirely responsible for damage to the cardiovascular system if circulating in the body.(6)
The spike protein gets into the blood and circulates through an individual’s blood over several days post-vaccination. Once it gets in the blood, it accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen, the bone marrow, the liver, the adrenal glands. Of particular concern is its accumulation in the ovaries in quite high concentrations.(7)
Scientists discovered the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein circulating in the blood of eleven of the thirteen healthcare workers who had received the Moderna vaccine. The spike protein could cross the blood-brain barrier, causing neurological damage, explaining why fatal blood clots are often seen in the brain.(8)
To conclude, here is a quote from Dr. Byram Bridle:
“We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin that can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation. Now, we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make the cells in our deltoid muscles manufacture this protein, [we now know] the vaccine itself plus the protein gets into blood circulation. When in circulation, the spike protein can bind to the receptors that are on our platelets and the cells that line our blood vessels. When that happens, it can do one of two things: it can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting—that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding, and of course, the heart is involved, which is part of the cardiovascular system, so that is why we are seeing heart problems.”(6)
Sources:
(1) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053430/
(2) https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-10-sars-cov-spike-proteins-disrupt-blood-brain.html
(3) https://beta.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2020-N-1898-0246
(4) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00758-5
(5) http://hmi-us.com/publications/sars-cov-2-prion-like-domains-in-spike-proteins-enable-higher-affinity-to-ace2.html
(6) https://uncoverdc.com/2021/05/31/vaccine-expert-warns-we-made-a-big-mistake/
(7) https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf
(8) https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
Concern 14:
DOWNLOAD OUR COVID 19 VACCINE CONCERNS FLIER HERE
KANSANS FOR HEALTH FREEDOM, INC. provides information on this site for general informational purposes only and the information is not intended to be and does constitute legal or medical advice. Anyone relying upon this information is advised to use their own judgment including consultation with their own physician, attorney, or other professionals before taking action based upon any information contained on this website.